Law

If you have been a Celexa patient in the past, and your unborn child has suffered developmental delays or birth defects, you might be eligible to file a Celexa lawsuit against your doctor. For most physicians, medical malpractice is a matter of second nature. However, if you are a Celexa recipient, chances are good that you have suffered some injury as a result of your drug regimen.

Most people who file these lawsuits never receive any compensation from their lawyers. The reason for this is because many plaintiffs lose their jobs due to the threat of having their cases settle out of court. Insurance companies are also wary of taking on a high-risk case. The insurance company’s entire business is based on being able to handle claims from sick and injured individuals. If a large percentage of its claims end up not being upheld, the premiums go up, the company loses millions and it goes bankrupt.

To illustrate how serious this issue can be, just ask yourself how many pharmaceutical products, including Celexa, have been recalled in recent years?

Probably a million or more. Rummelan, an anti-anxiety medication was taken off the market because of reports that it contained a false ingredient. Now, instead of just celexa, there’s Zoloft, an antidepressant. These and other medications are now on the list of medicines frequently linked to birth defects.

Unfortunately, some individuals will attempt to use a Celexa lawsuit to simply get compensated for lost wages, medical bills, etc.

If this happens, you run the risk of losing not only your case evaluation but your legal rights as well. You see, once an antidepressant medication is found to contain an element that may cause birth defects, then that particular ingredient is deemed unsafe for use. Now, once your lawsuit gets brought forward, it’s generally up to the courts to decide whether or not your claim should be compensated. Your doctor, however, has the burden to properly educate you and others about the dangers of the medication and the likelihood of such defects arising from use of the product.

Another element to consider is that although there is a link between antidepressants and Celexa lawsuit cases, the truth is that a vast majority of such cases are not proven.

The vast majority of plaintiffs who have been awarded substantial sums in recent Celexa lawsuits are actually related to a rare condition known as persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). This rare condition is so uncommon, in fact, that it has been deemed a deficiency symptom, which means it can not be diagnosed using standard diagnostic procedures.

Therefore, because CPHN is not a standard illness, it is extremely difficult to determine whether or not you have a chance of obtaining compensation when you seek out compensation from a Celexa lawsuit manufacturer.

Nevertheless, your chances are greatly increased if your attorney utilizes a case evaluation procedure that is highly effective at uncovering and documenting potentially relevant facts relevant to your claim. One such procedure that is effective is called a drug manufacturer case evaluation, which is essentially a review of documents related to the manufacture of the medications in question. It is designed to uncover relevant evidence that can be used to prove that the manufacturer of the drug is aware of the significant health risks associated with their product and chose to withhold this information from the general public in an effort to save money.

Some attorneys are aggressively going after Celexa and similar antidepressant lawsuits in recent years because they believe these lawsuits provide sufficient proof that the manufacturers knew about the potential for birth defects.

In some instances, they actually have a point. The FDA has been required by law to carefully monitor and regulate the manufacturing processes of drugs containing antidepressants for decades now, in an effort to ensure that these medications are used properly, which can prevent both short term and long term harm. It is widely believed that thousands of mothers have suffered unnecessary injuries due to the use of Celexa and similar antidepressants.

Unfortunately, the FDA is unable to establish whether or not a manufacturer of a drug has violated any regulations or laws. This is because the FDA lacks the power to regulate pharmaceuticals, and only the courts have the power to do so. One way that you can obtain additional information about whether or not you have a strong case for a Celexa lawsuit is to obtain a copy of the FDA’s “black box” file, which is basically the file where pharmaceuticals are tested and analyzed in order to detect any potential adverse reactions. This document will tell you whether or not the FDA has closed a potential negligence case relating to the manufacture of Celexa. If you were injured due to the deficiency in Celexa’s warning statement and/or the irregular heartbeat and irregular heart activity, then you may have a strong case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *